What began as an aviation incident quickly exposed the deeper fractures shaping West Africa’s security order. This was never just about airspace.
Zig Diaries | Opinion / Security Commentary
Date: Tuesday, 16 December 2025
Time: 10:49 WAT
Location: 📍 West Africa
The incident has evolved into a defining test of sovereignty, regional authority, and the widening divide between ECOWAS and the Alliance of Sahel States (AES).
The Alliance of Sahel States (AES) framed the episode as a matter of violated sovereignty. Nigeria treated it as a safety diversion. That disagreement alone transformed a technical issue into a symbolic contest over authority, respect, and regional power.
In today’s West Africa, sovereignty is no longer a slogan. It is asserted aggressively, tested publicly, and defended with consequence. Shared protocols that once guided regional cooperation now buckle under political mistrust.
Nigeria’s position cannot be separated from its role as the anchor of ECOWAS. For decades, ECOWAS embodied collective security discipline and democratic norms. The AES rejection of that framework signals something more dangerous than dissent. It marks fragmentation.
This incident revealed a widening rift. One bloc insists on collective regional order. The other asserts absolute autonomy. The space between those positions is where instability grows.
Beneath the African dispute lies a shifting geopolitical environment. External powers are recalibrating influence across the Sahel, often exploiting resentment and institutional fatigue. While this incident was not driven by proxies, it unfolded in a region already shaped by competing global interests. That context magnifies every move.
Burkina Faso’s leadership reaction at the operational level reflected leadership, discipline, and strategic judgment under pressure. More importantly, in moments like this, decisions are never merely technical. They carry political and military weight. His choices prevented escalation.
But the most uncomfortable revelation lies elsewhere.
Nigeria demonstrated the ability to shut down a coup attempt in another country within hours, with precision and coordination. That reality forces a hard question.
If such capability exists externally, why does insecurity persist internally?
Nigeria has never lacked military capacity. History proves that. From regional peacekeeping to complex operations abroad, capability has never been the core weakness. The problem likely lies in alignment, political will, intelligence integration, and sustained internal focus.
From the AES perspective, the incident reaffirmed determination to protect the political path they have chosen. Political calculations were active. Had a coup in Benin succeeded, alignment shifts were possible. A new AES member would have altered the regional balance significantly, something neither Nigeria nor ECOWAS could afford.
The fact that the aircraft surfaced in Burkina Faso’s airspace shortly after events in Benin deepened suspicion. Diplomatic norms remain intact, embassies operate, but trust is thinner.
The lingering question is unavoidable. If roles were reversed, if a Burkina aircraft required emergency landing in Nigeria under similar tension, what outcome would be expected?
Ultimately, this incident offered a glimpse of what assertive African sovereignty looks like when exercised decisively. It showed that when African states act with clarity and willpower, external influence can be limited.
This was not about airspace alone.
It was about authority.
It was about direction.
And it was about a question That can no longer be postpone.
🏷️ Tags: Nigeria, Burkina Faso, Benin Republic, ECOWAS, AES, West Africa Security, Sovereignty, Regional Politics
#Nigeria #BurkinaFaso #BeninRepublic #ECOWAS #AES #WestAfricaSecurity #ZigDiariesOpinion
~2.png)
0 Comments