Pretoria
says Washington’s latest human rights assessment misrepresents constitutional
reality and ignores America’s own record.
Zig Diaries
| Diplomacy
Date: Monday, 18 August 2025
Time: 08:30 WAT
Location: 📍 Pretoria, South Africa
The rebuke
comes after Washington released a 21-page report accusing South Africa of
worsening rights abuses, deepening tensions between the two nations.
South
Africa’s Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO) has
strongly rejected the latest U.S. Human Rights Report on South Africa, calling
it inaccurate, biased, and a distortion of the country’s constitutional
reality.
The 21-page
document, released by Washington this week, claimed that South Africa’s human
rights situation had “significantly worsened,” citing land expropriations from
Afrikaners, “abuses against racial minorities,” and alleged extrajudicial
killings in provinces like KwaZulu-Natal. DIRCO dismissed the claims as
misleading, stressing that criminal suspects are formally arraigned in court
and that the report relied on “discredited accounts.”
The
department also criticized the U.S. for issuing judgments on other countries
while itself refusing supervision by international mechanisms like the U.N.
Human Rights Council. It noted America’s own unresolved human rights
challenges, including racial inequality and systemic violence.
International
relations analyst Zimkhita Nene echoed that point, saying the critique exposed
a glaring inconsistency. She argued that South Africa’s constitution not only
meets international standards but also includes socioeconomic rights to redress
apartheid-era injustices. She contrasted this with the U.S., where movements
such as Black Lives Matter highlight systemic violence and racial inequality.
Relations
between Pretoria and Washington have remained strained, particularly since
South Africa filed a case against Israel at the International Court of Justice
over alleged violations of the Genocide Convention in Gaza. Tensions also
worsened during Donald Trump’s presidency, when the U.S. cut aid to South
Africa and expelled its ambassador after Pretoria criticized American foreign
policy.
Foreign
Minister Ronald Lamola recently warned that repeated U.S. interference in South
Africa’s domestic affairs had pushed bilateral relations “to a low.”
Fact-Check
& Background:
South Africa’s constitution is widely regarded as one of the most progressive
in the world, guaranteeing socioeconomic rights alongside civil and political
freedoms.
While rights abuses and police misconduct have been documented in the country, Pretoria has consistently rejected claims of systematic state-led persecution of minorities.
U.S. human rights reports are annual assessments
mandated by Congress, but they often face criticism for reflecting Washington’s
foreign policy priorities rather than balanced observation.
🏷️ Tags: South Africa, United States, Human Rights,
Diplomacy, Pretoria, Washington, Ronald Lamola, DIRCO
#ZigDiariesDiplomacy #SouthAfrica #UnitedStates #HumanRights #Pretoria
#Washington
0 Comments